Skip to main content

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE – MODULE OUTLINE

This module is intended for advanced undergraduates in business and management, accounting, finance, or economics, and Master students. The module is delivered over a total of 24 hours of lectures with a flexible format including traditional lectures, class discussions of the end-of-chapter questions in Goergen (2018) and the multiple choice questions (see below). 

AIMS OF THE MODULE

This module aims to introduce you to recent developments in the theory and practice of corporate governance. The module adopts an international perspective by comparing the main corporate governance systems across the world. 

LEARNING OUTCOMES OF THE MODULE

On completion of the module you should be able to: Evaluate the current state of corporate governance in an international context; describe differences in corporate control and managerial power across the world; assess the potential conflicts of interests that may arise in various corporate governance environments; critically evaluate the effectiveness of the main corporate governance mechanisms and their impact on firm value; explain the potential consequences of weak corporate governance as well as behavioural biases on corporate decision making and firm value; analyse the development of corporate social responsibility. 

SYLLABUS CONTENT

  1. Defining corporate governance and key theoretical models
  2. Corporate control across the world – Control versus ownership rights
  3. Taxonomies of corporate governance systems
  4. Boards of directors
  5. The disciplining of badly performing managers under different systems of corporate governance 
  6. Corporate governance regulation in an international context
  7. Corporate governance in emerging markets
  8. Behavioural biases and corporate governance
  9. Corporate social responsibility and socially responsible investment 

READING

Goergen, M. (2018), Corporate Governance. A Global Perspective. Andover: Cengage EMA, ISBN 978-1-473-75917-6.

Defining corporate governance and key theoretical models

Goergen (2018), chapter 1.

Corporate control across the world Control versus ownership rights

Goergen (2018), chapters 2-3.

Taxonomies of corporate governance systems

Goergen (2018), chapter 4.

Boards of directors

Goergen (2018), chapter 7.

Incentivising managers and disciplining badly performing managers

Goergen (2018), chapter 8.

Corporate governance regulation in an international context

Goergen (2018), chapter 6.
Further resources
An extensive library covering most national and international codes of corporate governance can be found on the website of the European Corporate Governance Institute (ECGI): http://www.ecgi.global/content/codes 

Corporate governance in emerging markets

Goergen (2018), chapter 9.

Behavioural biases and corporate governance

Goergen (2018), chapter 12.

Corporate social responsibility and socially responsible investment

Goergen (2018), chapter 13.

ADDITIONAL MODULE RESOURCES

PowerPoint Slides
100 multiple choice questions
End-of-chapter discussion questions and exercises – Instructor’s manual 
European Corporate Governance Institute (ECGI)
Andrei Shleifer’s dataset website with investor protection and anti-director rights indices
Social Sciences Research Network

NOTE

The above module outline is just one of the many paths through Goergen (2018). There are others, some of which are depicted in the diagram below.

Popular posts from this blog

DMGT Plc - Not your typical UK Plc

I haven't posted any of these corporate governance case studies for a while. As the updated version of my corporate governance textbook is about to be published on 11 March 2018, I thought it was a good time to investigate the corporate governance of another interesting company. The company I have chosen is the Daily Mail and General Trust Plc (DMGT Plc), a UK company. This is a media company which owns a.o. the tabloid The Daily Mail and the free newspaper Metro. It also has a holding in Euromoney Institutional Plc and Zoopla.



I chose DMGT Plc as it is not your run-of-the-mill UK stock-market listed Plc. The typical example of a UK exchange-listed corporation would be a Plc with dispersed ownership and weak control (see Section 3.3 of my textbook International Corporate Governanceor its updated version Corporate Governance. A Global Perspective). This is what I call combination A in my textbook (see below figure).


It what follows, I shall be using the 2017 annual report of DMGT P…

Dos and Don'ts of Approaching a Potential PhD Supervisor

Similar to most academics, I get lots of unsolicited emails from potential PhD students asking me whether I would be willing to supervise them. Hence, I thought I should put together the Dos and Don'ts of doing this. DosDon'tsEmail only potential supervisors in your area of research.Email everybody in the department or school. Start your email with "Dear Sir or Madam".Specify a topic that is of interest to you. Be as specific as possible. Ideally, you should attach a detailed research proposal to your email.State that you want to do a PhD in an area as large and vague as e.g. finance. Write that, since the age of 5, it has been your dream to do a PhD. (I didn't know what a PhD was at that age!) This is not a great start.The choice of the university is an important consideration. So is identifying a suitable supervisor. Do your research by consulting staff profiles. Choose a supervisor who is research active in your field of interest.Email a potential supervisor …
The private equity deals that fail to justify 'fast buck' strategiesBy Marc Goergen, Cardiff University; Geoffrey Wood, University of Warwick, and Noel O'Sullivan, Loughborough UniversityThere is an ongoing and very heated debate between the unconditional supporters of private equity and their opponents. It’s not hard to see why. On the surface, these investors can often buy fragile companies, load on debt to fund strategic change and sack workers in a bid for efficiency. It can look ruthless, but the industry claims it simply works.The British Private Equity & Venture Capital Association (BVCA), preach what they deem to be the undeniable benefits of private equity. For example, the trade lobby group wrote in 2010 that:Private equity investment has been demonstrated to contribute significantly to companies’ growth. Private equity backed companies outperform leading UK businesses.In contrast, Ed Miliband in his speech at the 2011 annual Labour Party conference accused p…